The picture depicts the way I found to attach it to the tripod: a removable vice. The tripod is lightweight, but on a field without vegetation I don't need to extend it fully, so the center of mass will be as low as possible.
Then I needed to see how it performs, depending on the position of the TX signal vs focal point. Here things got interesting. We have installed locally up in the mountains a WebSDR equipped with just an LNB pointing towards the Pianura Padana. It covers 10368.0-10369.0 MHz and receives signals beyond 300 km. It is at about 40 km from my home, slightly behind a building, into the Fresnel zone I dare to say.
The "red cover" TX was put into service. Its TX patch antennas are quite off the focal point, closer to the dish and on a side. The resulting beam, as seen on the remote RX waterfall is quite wide, with strong sidelobes. I could not get a null.
Second TX head. |
I am worried that dealing with two dishes will make beaming twice as time consuming, but at least the HB100 TX has a form of passive thermal stabilisation that keeps it relatively still in frequency once it reaches equilibrium.
Unfortunately the dish weight makes it difficult to make smooth movements on the cheap tripod, but that is what I have for now.
Last but not least, going from about 25°C (home) to full sunshine (35°C, not measured) resulted in 2 MHz frequency change downwards of the whole system. Good to know when arranging for real QSOs!